Friday, April 10, 2009
Sho(w)e Stopper
Throwing rotten eggs and tomatoes at the performers on stage whom public found boring is something everyone had heard of.
But on 14th December, 2008, Muntazer al-Zaidi, a journalist from al-Baghdadia TV innovated and how! He hurled two shoes at the then US President on his last visit to Iraq during a press conference.
Though it started with Bush, now there seems to be no end. In all the major shoe throwing incidents so far, at the recieving ends have been political leaders of huge status - the American President, the Chinese PM and the Indian Home minister.
If used effectively, such a form of protest can have maximum Yield (= effect/cost*punishment).
A shoe thrown at any political leader becomes a metaphor for dissent and the anger filled up among public. The shoe never misses the target, it always hits the Bull's eye. It gets more media coverage than any other forms of protest and people discuss about it with glee. The video of the shoe thrown at Bush became the most searched for video on YouTube and the incident also led to the development of various flash games.
The chances of punishment are also less because, in order to show how he is great the leader is, he generally tries to cover up his humiliation and forgives the person. The Iraqi journalist who had thrown the shoe at Bush had been sentenced for three years in prison, but now the term has been reduced to one year. In India, not only Jarnail Singh has been 'forgiven' by Mr. Chidambaram, he has also got offers for contesting polls from various political parties. Both these journalists have been hailed as a hero.
In terms of political ramifications, the shoe thrown at Mr. Chidambaram has so far been the most effective. It cost Jagdish Tytler and Sajjan Kumar their Lok Sabha nominations.
And, the time consumed and the cost of throwing shoe is minimal compared to other kinds of protest such as organising rallies, bandhs, hunger strike, etc. You just need an ordinary shoe and no extra wastage of time.
So, why is it so effective?
First of all, any object thrown by a common man at a prominent leader is a symbol for the expression of anger against the leader and the policies of his government.
Secondly, it's an object worn at our feet. When a shoe is thrown, it shows the disregard and disgust for the leader. Its a symbol for one's disrespect towards the person. However much the leader may try to brush the incident aside, the point is conveyed to everyone.
Thirdly, it's an act performed by one among the masses, a journalist or a protestor, people can relate more with it individually.
The more prominent the leader, the better. In the case of Bush, who is infamous around the globe, the news of the incident spread to every part of the world.
Shoe throwing in nothing less than a show stopper!
However, the effect will diminish because of over-use. In order to maintain the novelty of such a form of protest, people must keep improvising. For a start, people must start hitting the targets.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
Nice read this one!
Though I disagree with your endnote. Clearly there will be an over-use of this.... eh, form of protest if you may, and it will lose its novelty and with it the damaging effect. But aiming right would hardly have the desired effect.
Imo, if the shoes start hitting the target that would change the equation altogether. Why else do you think Jarnail Singh never bothered to throw it right? He never intended the shoe to hit the minister, lest he gathered some sympathy himself.
eh, i just wanted some humour at the end..
yeah i agree that aiming right will lose the desired effect but do you think Jarnail Singh puposefully aimed wrongly? If he could do that, he should rather become baseball pitcher and not a journalist..
Anyway, hail Jarnailism!
Of course he did. I have seen like a 100 replays of it on news channels. He just got up and mildly deposited the shoe near Chidambaram. A sharp one that he is, our home minister quickly realised that, and rose up to the occasion to forgive him, like a true member of the party of the mahatma.
saw the videos myself, and i think it was far from 'deposited'.. the shoe flew past him at considerable velocity..
check it out from this angle
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l43XxMjgmH8
I agree with crazy photon on the issue of 'deposition' of the shoe. It was intended to miss the target. The 'velocity' of shoe zooming past PC seemed high because it was a close-up shot!
Anyway, an interesting read!
But the over-use of shoe-missile to make one's point will dilute its effect!
Thanks Apurv!
@Aneesh 2-1. haa! :P
And woah! On a slightly more serious note, you really need to get some non-engineers to comment here now ;)
lets ask Jarnail Singh, eh?
only he knows what he did..
velocity ... deposition..come on guyz...!! its just a bechara 'shoe'... th poor shoe is asking.. "maine kya kiya ??!!"
lolz.. on a more serious note.. i agree with the 3 points you have pointed out... it is very effective... more so because of the drama attached to it.. and our dear media's tendency of lappin up any dramatical incidents..!!
But Mr. Jrnail Singh did get his message across..!!
I don't know if Mr. Singh threw the shoe or merely deposited it (as KG said.. we vl hv to ask him..!!..) but in th video it does look like he merely threw it lightly... he certainly wasnt trying to hit th target.. that wud hv made things worse fr him.. it had to b symbolic..
Karan
Non Engineering Guy..!! :P
Post a Comment